Why was the Rolls Royce Meteor engine lowered?
Why was the Rolls Royce Meteor engine lowered?
The engine was commissioned for use in the new Cromwell tank. Changes were made to the Cromwell tank development programme to accommodate the new engine. To enable fitting in-line with a Merrit-Brown gear (and steering) box, the engine was lowered.
What was the name of the Rolls Royce tank engine?
A new tank specification, A27M, was produced for design of the Meteor-powered tank. The Meteor engine went on to become one of the most successful British tank engines.
Where was the first Rolls Royce Meteor tank tested?
It retained the Merlin dual ignition system; each cylinder had two sparking plugs each driven from separate magnetos . The first Merlin prepared for tank use was despatched in a modified Crusader tank on 6 April 1941 to Aldershot, and tested on the Army standard speed course behind Farnborough.
Why did Rolls Royce choose the Merlin 3 engine?
The Kestrel, while having more power than the existing ” Liberty ” or Meadows engines, did not provide the desirable 20 bhp per ton required, so the Merlin III was chosen. Robotham was at pains to point out that Rolls-Royce could not manufacture the engines, so would not benefit commercially.
The engine was commissioned for use in the new Cromwell tank. Changes were made to the Cromwell tank development programme to accommodate the new engine. To enable fitting in-line with a Merrit-Brown gear (and steering) box, the engine was lowered.
A new tank specification, A27M, was produced for design of the Meteor-powered tank. The Meteor engine went on to become one of the most successful British tank engines.
It retained the Merlin dual ignition system; each cylinder had two sparking plugs each driven from separate magnetos . The first Merlin prepared for tank use was despatched in a modified Crusader tank on 6 April 1941 to Aldershot, and tested on the Army standard speed course behind Farnborough.
The Kestrel, while having more power than the existing ” Liberty ” or Meadows engines, did not provide the desirable 20 bhp per ton required, so the Merlin III was chosen. Robotham was at pains to point out that Rolls-Royce could not manufacture the engines, so would not benefit commercially.
