Is the AMD FX 8350 good for gaming?

Is the AMD FX 8350 good for gaming?

AMD FX 8350 is the ultra-budget king if you are looking for 100+ fps gaming at 1080p resolution. You cannot go 4k on this processor, but it’s still good enough to produce decent scores on the 3d mark. The CPU does not have a lot of physics to deal with, thus maintaining high framerates.

Is the FX 8350 a good CPU?

5.0 out of 5 stars Good CPU for the price. I bought this to replace my AMD fx 6300 which I think is a not a great CPU. The AMD fx 6300 is a 6 core CPU 3.5ghz. The AMD fx 8350 is an 8 core 4.0 GHz CPU.

Is the AMD FX 8350 Bad?

The 8350 is certainly not useless and it has more raw CPU power than most i5s, except for 4690K or when i5s are overclocked. But games usually don’t leverage more than 4 threads efficiency, with one or 2 exceptions and the 970 is a much too faster GPU for that CPU. AMD FX CPUs are wonderful, but your 970 needs an i5.

What is the Intel equivalent to AMD FX 8350?

We believe that the nearest equivalent to FX-8350 from Intel is Core i7-4770T, which is faster by 2% and higher by 10 positions in our rating.

Is FX-8350 good for editing?

It depends what applications you run. If it’s heavy video editing software that can utilize the extra cores of the FX-8350, then it’ll be fine. If it only uses a few, then it will be bottlenecking.

Why is the FX 8350 so bad?

On top of poor performance, these CPUs ran hot and used a lot of power. They did not have integrated graphics, and weren’t much better deals than Intel competition for most of their life. AMD was betting on applications becoming significantly multithreaded, which they didn’t.

When did AMD 8350 come out?

2012
Piledriver Core (Vishera, 32 nm)